Critique of ideology

How to overcome the mechanical conception of both the human being and society

7 September, 2020 · Critique of ideology

«Detroit», by Diego de Rivera

Empiricism and mechanicism served as the basis for the great political and social apparatuses of capitalism, today completely obsolete, rigid and incapable of guaranteeing a future for workers and humanity. No vertical machinery led by an exploiting class will guarantee the satisfaction of human needs, however techno-futurist it may present itself.

Racialism, feminism and equality

25 July, 2020 · Critique of ideology

Why are racialism and feminism replacing movements for «equality of rights» There is a certain pattern in the way these movements expanded globally in the last four years. Feminism and Anglo-Saxon-style racialism share identical arguments and tools in their structure. However, while feminism has been adopted as a state ideology in several continental European countries, racialism is receiving, especially in France, a head-on response from the state itself and its left wing.

The limits of knowledge under class society

9 May, 2020 · Critique of ideology

The Seven Liberal Arts, 1435. El Prado Museum

Feudalism and capitalism generated their own ideological and knowledge systems in response to the interests and activities of their ruling classes. Both the aristocratic liberal arts and the mechanical arts of workshops, doctors and merchants, pushed the knowledge of Humanity during their respective rising periods. And in the same way, the monopoly of both put brakes on the development of the [[productive forces]] during their respective [[decadence|periods of decline]]. Both were and are partial visions of the maximum possibilities offered to Humanity... possibilities that can only begin to take shape by bringing together a Humanity divided into classes.

Did “neoliberalism” ever exist?

18 April, 2020 · Critique of ideology

The insistence on "neoliberalism" was in fact the insistence on the validity of an "alternative capitalism", reformed and allegedly possible. In other words, it was not even reformist, because reformism intended the possibility of overcoming capitalism through reforms, and these only aspired to make it livable... without managing to be less utopian and therefore reactionary.