Blog of Emancipation

We also publish
The Marxist Dictionary (EN)
and the School of Marxism (ES).

Emancipation Statements


  • You may also find usefull our Navigation Map: all our articles in English ordered by section and date.

Who wins and who loses in the Nagorno-Karabakh

2020-11-10 | Caucasus

Tonight Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan confirmed a total ceasefire agreement with Azerbaijan involving the handover of territory by both sides and guaranteed by the deployment of 2,000 troops by Russia. The agreement, immediately confirmed by Putin on a national chain and presented by the Baku government as an Armenian surrender, raised a crowd in Yerevan to the shout of Nikol traitor! But who is actually winning and who is losing?


The big winner is Russia. Russia has taken advantage of a critical moment in which the conquest of Shoshi by the Azeri army prompted the Armenian military to fear a total collapse, while [the shooting down of a Russian helicopter on Armenian soil by the Azeris](https://www. lemonde.fr/international/article/2020/11/09/un-helicoptere-militaire-russe-abattu-en-armenie-l-azerbaidjan-presente-ses-excuses_6059138_3210.html) made Baku fear an immediate Russian military intervention in compliance with the military agreement between Yerevan and Moscow.

Russia thus shows to all involved powers that Moscow is the one setting the regional order. It reveals the impotence of France, Germany and the United States -the Minsk Group- and reminds Iran, Israel and above all Turkey that Russia is the one setting the limits and the times in all the alliances that make up the Caucasus.

Joint Turkish-Azeri maneuvers that served to prepare the war and equip the Azeri army.

That is why the most direct loser is Turkey, which once again proves its inability to exert its military weight - decisive on the ground - in lasting strategic and commercial successes. Erdogan did not intend to erode Russian hegemony in its backyard, he simply wanted to be recognized by Russia as a regional power, gain a seat at the cease-fire negotiation table and get something to bargain with in Syria and Libya. Nothing could be further from the final result.

Turkey's miscalculation is also due to its tendency to believe that the actors it supports will always adhere to its course of action. However, neither its Libyan nor its Azeri allies would like Turkey's support to be so impressive as to leave them no wiggle room.

Al- Monitor

The peace in Nagorno-Karabakh comes after Turkey received a serious Russian kick in Syria and while in Libya the peace negotiations have become a real [front for the expulsion of mercenaries and Turkish forces](https://mainichi. jp/english/articles/20201105/p2g/00m/0in/059000c) in which only the Muslim Brotherhood, increasingly weak in the government of Tripoli, remains faithful to Ankara.

It is true that the warmongering party of the Turkish bourgeoisie and bureaucracy had left little room for Erdogan. They urged him to keep on with his policy of imperialist affirmation as a way to obtain economic results as soon as possible in the midst of an economic crisis which is proving more and more disastrous for Turkish national capital.

So this failure, a new military victory without economic booty, is very likely to be seen soon as the beginning of the end of erdoganism.

Ultranationalist demonstrators assault the Armenian Parliament and beat up its President.

In the internal politics of the Caucasus the big winner is again Russia. Pashinyan, who was far from being well seen by the Kremlin, is not only weakened in the face of the warmongering ultra-nationalism which he attempted to ride, but he owes his survival - and that of his army - to Moscow.

The Azeri government, which has displayed the most obscene nationalism even after the cease-fire declaration, obtains a historical triumph beyond its real objectives: it recovers not only the buffer territories that Armenia had secured in Azeri majority areas, but more than half of Nagorno-Karabakh, leaving the border in Shushi, at the gates of Stepanakert, the capital of the Artsakh ethnic ghost state. It is a triumph... but it will have its borders - and its pipelines - directly and legally monitored by Russia ad aeternum.

A nationalist demonstration surrounds the Parliament in Baku on July 15 calling for mobilization and war

4 But the real loser of the conflict is on both sides of the war zone. Nationalism means the subordination of human needs to the interests of national capital. The wave of nationalism and warmongering in both countries has been fed for decades by the state and its means, and it is being pushed by a large, angry petty bourgeoisie which does not lack the enthusiastic support of a furious clergy, but in the end it has been fundamental in dragging the workers to the holocaust in the altar of the motherland.

According to Putin's statements, before the final Azeri offensive more than 2,000 people had already died on each side. Mostly young workers mobilized by both armies and small peasants and workers victims of bombings in which even cluster bombs have been used. We may not know exactly the total number of deaths.

The triumph of nationalism on both sides, even in defeat and slaughter, weakens the workers of the whole region and shows a dangerous path: it tells the ruling classes of the whole world that, under certain conditions, they can turn the revolt of the petty bourgeoisie into a sacred union for war by preventing the threat of war from awakening [the only class that can put an end to barbarism](https://es. communia.blog/4-marxism-basic-positions-on-war-and-internationalism/).